Narrative Identity Construction of Chinese Undergraduates in English under a Humanistic Exchange Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/98qrah37Keywords:
Narrative Identity, Chinese Undergraduates, English Language Learning, Humanistic Exchange, Intercultural Communication, Poststructuralist Identity TheoryAbstract
This study investigates how Chinese undergraduate students construct narrative identities in English within a humanistic exchange framework. Drawing on poststructuralist theories of identity and narrative inquiry methodology, the research examines the lived experiences of fifteen Chinese undergraduates enrolled in a humanities-oriented English program at a major Chinese university. Data were collected through semi-structured narrative interviews, reflective journals, and classroom discourse recordings over two academic semesters. The findings reveal that students engage in a multifaceted process of identity negotiation as they narrate personal experiences, cultural values, and intercultural encounters in English. Three dominant identity themes emerged from the data: the reflective self, the intercultural mediator, and the critical thinker. The humanistic exchange framework, which emphasizes empathy, dialogue, and mutual understanding, was found to facilitate deeper engagement with identity construction by providing students with a safe and supportive discursive space. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on second language identity by demonstrating how humanistic pedagogical principles can foster meaningful narrative identity work among Chinese English learners. Implications for curriculum design, teacher education, and intercultural communication pedagogy are discussed.
Downloads
References
[1] Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
[2] Barkhuizen, G. (Ed.). (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. Routledge.
[3] Benson, P., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2005). Learners' stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What is the difference? Language Teaching, 56(2), 186 196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000518.
[5] Kim, J. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. SAGE Publications.
[6] Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
[7] Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge.
[8] Menard Warwick, J. (2008). The cultural and the local in migration narratives: Double voicing and the construction of teacher identity. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 566 588. https:// doi. org/ 10.1002/j.1545 7249.2008.tb00331.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










