Research on Generative AI-Empowered Formative Assessment of Maritime English: Evaluation Indicators and Practical Paths

Authors

  • Xiang Huang Jiangsu Maritime Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211170, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/7v3qsn29

Keywords:

Generative AI, Maritime English, Formative Assessment, STCW Convention, ESP Teaching

Abstract

The Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention set compliance requirements for seafarers’ maritime communicative competence; however, higher-vocational Maritime English assessment still relies mainly on summative final-term evaluation, with high oral-assessment costs and delayed feedback. Drawing on the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) philosophy and formative assessment theory, and supported by generative AI and intelligent speech-judgment technology, this study constructs a three-dimensional evaluation indicator system and designs a human-AI collaborative assessment closed loop of “pre-class diagnosis, in-class dynamic monitoring, and post-class iterative feedback”. A 16-week quasi-experiment shows that this model significantly improves students’ maritime English communicative competence, with the largest gain in the oral dimension (18.7% improvement in the experimental class versus 5.3% in the control class), and enhances students’ learning initiative. The study also analyzes the validity defects and academic-integrity risks of AI-driven assessment and proposes human-AI collaborative verification mechanisms, providing practical references for curriculum assessment reform of higher-vocational Maritime English and for STCW-aligned talent training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

[2] Yuan, S. H., & Shu, D. F. (2017). Review and reflection on formative assessment research in foreign-language teaching in China (2002–2016). Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 51–56, 21. (in Chinese)

[3] Xu, P. (2023). Design and practice of formative-assessment model for sea-related specialty English practical courses. Journal of Jimei University (Education Science Edition), 24(3), 72–78. (in Chinese)

[4] Wu, X. H. (2018). Current situation and countermeasures of Maritime-English teaching research in China. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 35(1), 69–75. (in Chinese)

[5] Lu, G. Q., Yang, Q., & He, X. M. (2024). Value, challenges and paths of generative-AI empowering formative assessment in higher education. E-education Research, 45(11), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.11.012 (in Chinese)

[6] Chen, X. R. (2024). ChatGPT and L2 pragmatics teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 16–29. (in Chinese)

[7] Ren, W., Liu, Y. B., & Xie, Y. (2024). A comparative study of ChatGPT feedback versus teacher feedback in EFL writing teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 30–38, 60. (in Chinese)

[8] Xue, H. L., & Qiao, H. Y. (2019). Curriculum reconstruction of marine-engineering English based on the localization of IMO Model Course. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 36(4), 106–109. (in Chinese)

Downloads

Published

22-10-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Huang, X. (2026). Research on Generative AI-Empowered Formative Assessment of Maritime English: Evaluation Indicators and Practical Paths. Academic Journal of Education, 3(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.54097/7v3qsn29