Research on Generative AI-Empowered Formative Assessment of Maritime English: Evaluation Indicators and Practical Paths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/7v3qsn29Keywords:
Generative AI, Maritime English, Formative Assessment, STCW Convention, ESP TeachingAbstract
The Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention set compliance requirements for seafarers’ maritime communicative competence; however, higher-vocational Maritime English assessment still relies mainly on summative final-term evaluation, with high oral-assessment costs and delayed feedback. Drawing on the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) philosophy and formative assessment theory, and supported by generative AI and intelligent speech-judgment technology, this study constructs a three-dimensional evaluation indicator system and designs a human-AI collaborative assessment closed loop of “pre-class diagnosis, in-class dynamic monitoring, and post-class iterative feedback”. A 16-week quasi-experiment shows that this model significantly improves students’ maritime English communicative competence, with the largest gain in the oral dimension (18.7% improvement in the experimental class versus 5.3% in the control class), and enhances students’ learning initiative. The study also analyzes the validity defects and academic-integrity risks of AI-driven assessment and proposes human-AI collaborative verification mechanisms, providing practical references for curriculum assessment reform of higher-vocational Maritime English and for STCW-aligned talent training.
Downloads
References
[1] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
[2] Yuan, S. H., & Shu, D. F. (2017). Review and reflection on formative assessment research in foreign-language teaching in China (2002–2016). Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 51–56, 21. (in Chinese)
[3] Xu, P. (2023). Design and practice of formative-assessment model for sea-related specialty English practical courses. Journal of Jimei University (Education Science Edition), 24(3), 72–78. (in Chinese)
[4] Wu, X. H. (2018). Current situation and countermeasures of Maritime-English teaching research in China. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 35(1), 69–75. (in Chinese)
[5] Lu, G. Q., Yang, Q., & He, X. M. (2024). Value, challenges and paths of generative-AI empowering formative assessment in higher education. E-education Research, 45(11), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2024.11.012 (in Chinese)
[6] Chen, X. R. (2024). ChatGPT and L2 pragmatics teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 16–29. (in Chinese)
[7] Ren, W., Liu, Y. B., & Xie, Y. (2024). A comparative study of ChatGPT feedback versus teacher feedback in EFL writing teaching. Foreign Language Teaching and Practice, (4), 30–38, 60. (in Chinese)
[8] Xue, H. L., & Qiao, H. Y. (2019). Curriculum reconstruction of marine-engineering English based on the localization of IMO Model Course. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 36(4), 106–109. (in Chinese)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










