Identity and Engagement in EAP Writing Classes for Multilingual Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/vdpf5y57Keywords:
Identity Construction, Student Engagement, Multilingual Learners, English for Academic Purposes, Translanguaging, Academic WritingAbstract
In the past, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) mainly focused on the language system and structure of school life. Recently, many scholars have been studying how writing can also serve as a tool for self-construction and identity formation in the modern era. Examine the complex relationship between identity and participation of multilingual learners in EAP writing classes in this paper. According to post-structuralist theories of identity and multi-dimensional models of student engagement, this study finds that language learners are not communication-impaired individuals but rather complex people with various cultural and academic demands that need to be managed simultaneously. Based on the analysis, authorial presence, social investment and power relations directly affect how much students are willing to participate in academic writing activities at different levels of behaviour, emotion and cognition. In addition, this paper also proposes some practical teaching strategies that promote the construction of an all-inclusive learning environment, such as translanguaging, culturally sensitive feedback, and dialogic teaching. In the end, the study believes that recognising and honouring the various identities of multilingual learners will foster a sense of belonging and drive them to learn better in higher education.
Downloads
References
[1] Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/ 10. 2307/ 3587803.
[2] Zamel, V. (1995). Strangers in academia: The experiences of faculty and ESL students across the curriculum. College Composition and Communication, 46(4), 506–521. https:// doi. org/ 10.58680/ccc19958719.
[3] Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5.
[4] Leki, I. (2001). "A narrow thinking system": Nonnative English speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39–67. https:// doi. org/ 10.2307/3587859.
[5] Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378 2166(02)00035 8.
[6] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https: //doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
[7] Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573–603. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588281.
[8] Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240.
[9] Canagarajah, A. S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2, 1–28. https://doi.org/10. 1515/ 9783 110239331.1.
[10] Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ S026719051 4000191.
[11] Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H. (2015). Identity in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400021X.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










