Teacher Autonomy in Chinese Public Kindergartens Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory

Authors

  • Lei Zhou Graduate School, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cwvaqq40

Keywords:

Self-Determination Theory, Public Kindergartens, Teachers’ Independent Management Rights

Abstract

To address practical industry problems including the lack of teachers’ independent class management rights, insufficient internal work motivation and weakened professional sense of gain under the centralized administrative management model of public kindergartens in China, this paper adopts the framework of three core psychological needs proposed by Self-Determination Theory. It analyzes the dual educational and managerial values of preschool teachers’ independent management rights in public kindergartens, and sorts out practical dilemmas triggered by campus centralized control, quantitative assessment and hierarchical communication barriers, such as restricted authority, low self-efficacy and weak organizational belonging. The research shows that appropriately delegating micro preschool education and care decision-making power, cultivating teachers’ management capabilities through tiered empowerment, and building a flat communication mechanism can satisfy teachers’ basic psychological needs, activate the endogenous motivation for preschool education and care work. This research can provide theoretical references and practical ideas for public kindergartens to optimize campus governance structures, improve teachers’ power and responsibility systems, and advance refined governance of preschool education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Leonard, J. M., & Philippe, L. F. (2025). Priming need-frustrating memories sparks conspiracy beliefs: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jopy.70032.

[2] Gerstenberg, R., Høeg, R. E., Deeder, K. D. V. J., et al. (2025). Applying self-determination theory to behavior change technologies: Insights from two projects in the health domain. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/ fpsyg. 2025.1634267.

[3] Liu, L., She, L., Cafferkey, K., et al. (2025). Hybrid HRM systems and employee well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Management Decision, 63(9), 3090–3109. https:// doi. org/10.1108/md-02-2024-0276.

[4] Jia, Q., Hernández, M. C., & Martínez, P. J. (2025). Mapping the integration of theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory in education: A scoping review on teachers’ behavioral intentions. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111529.

[5] Huang, Y., & Mai, Y. M. (2025). Integrating self-determination theory and social cognitive theory to explain student engagement in ideological-political courses. Region - Educational Research and Reviews, 7(10). https://doi.org/ 10. 32629/ rerr. v7i10.4828.

[6] Yang, J., & Li, R. (2025). The art and science of serious game design: A quasi-experimental study based on self-determination theory in traditional Chinese culture education. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg. 2025. 1536513.

[7] Yu, D. (2024). Research on the development path of physical education dance teaching in colleges and universities based on self-determination theory. Frontiers in Sport Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.25236/fsr.2024.060521.

Downloads

Published

09-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhou, L. (2026). Teacher Autonomy in Chinese Public Kindergartens Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory. Academic Journal of Education, 2(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.54097/cwvaqq40